article by: Dor Cohen – Software QA Engineer
In the world of software testing, one of the most important decisions every QA team faces is: When should we test manually, and when should we automate? The choice between these two approaches directly impacts product quality, release speed, and resource management within the team.
So how do you decide?
In this article, we’ll break it down: the key differences, when each method is most effective, and some real-world examples we encounter in day-to-day QA work.
What is Manual Testing?
Manual testing is the process where a tester goes through the system themselves – either following predefined test cases or exploring the product in an exploratory way. It’s a basic but essential method, especially in the early stages of development or when you want to evaluate the product from the perspective of a real user.
Advantages:
- Excellent for validating user experience (UX), design, and usability.
- Flexible – allows for adapting tests on the fly and in real time.
- Doesn’t require programming skills or special infrastructure.
Disadvantages:
- Time-consuming – especially with large test suites.
- Prone to human error and inconsistency.
- Not cost-effective for repetitive regression testing.
When to Use Manual Testing:
- Testing new features or UI screens still under development.
- In a complex environment, in a multi-process system
- UX and design validation.
- One-off tests that are not worth automating.
- When no automation framework is available yet.
What is Automated Testing?
Automated testing is the process of running tests using code that simulates user actions – faster, more consistent, and without fatigue. It is most commonly implemented with tools such as Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, and Appium (for mobile).
Advantages:
- Speed – can execute hundreds of test cases in minutes.
- Accuracy – tests run the exact same steps every time.
- CI/CD Integration – automated tests can run automatically with every commit.
- Cost-effective long term – especially for repetitive regression testing.
Disadvantages:
- Requires initial development and ongoing maintenance
- Small UI changes can cause tests to break.
- Not suitable for validating look, feel, or UX.
When to Use Automated Testing:
- Regression testing for features that
- API testing, performance checks, and form validations.
- Critical business processes that must run consistently across releases.
Quick Comparison:
| Criterion: | Manual Testing: | Automated Testing: |
|---|---|---|
| Speed: | Slow | Very fast |
| Flexibility: | High (adaptable, can find the unexpected) | Low (limited to predefined scripts). |
| UX validation: | Excellent | Not suitable |
| Human errors: | Possible | Minimal |
| Long-term cost: | Expensive | Cost-effective for repetitive testing |
| Initial investment: | Very Low | High (setup, code, maintenance) |
Real-World Examples:
- UX Testing for a Mobile App Screen – Checking scrolling, gestures, design responsiveness → Best done manually.
- E- commerce Checkout Flow – Multiple scenarios like adding/removing products, applying coupons, calculating totals → Ideal for automation.
- ERP System API Testing – Automated regression suite that validates endpoints across every release → Saves significant manual effort.
Conclusion:
A smart and efficient QA strategy doesn’t rely on one approach alone – it leverages both manual and automated testing. The key is knowing when to apply each method: depending on the product’s stability, business risk, and available resources.
Manual testing brings creativity, intuition, better test coverage and flexibility. Automated testing brings speed, reliability, and efficiency. The true art of QA lies in combining them to achieve the highest product quality.
WhatsApp
Call me